Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2016 20:31:07 GMT -5
I never said will bump from 70 to 90 . I clearly said bump by 10 per year until we reach 90.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2016 21:32:05 GMT -5
I voted for 70 simply because 50 spots in the minors is huge as it is. Teams are just getting to this limit, and now it's time for hard choices. Just don't see what the rationale is for expanding it further, to be honest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Djurgardens on Apr 19, 2016 21:47:36 GMT -5
Voted.
|
|
|
|
Post by burnsy8801(Leafs GM) on Apr 20, 2016 9:28:50 GMT -5
I voted for 70 as this is a fantasy league and does somewhat mirror the real NHL and from what I understand NHL teams have 50 contract limits per team. Like others have said the waiver wire is so thin already 1 round maybe 2 is plenty to go fishing with every year. Once you get past the top 10 or 15 the rest are plugs. Plugs don't win this pool.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Apr 20, 2016 12:00:40 GMT -5
Barrie, Belfast, Helsinki, Kokanee, Quebec still to vote.
and Saint John, sorry
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2016 12:30:52 GMT -5
Barrie, Belfast, Helsinki, Kokanee, Quebec still to vote. Don't we have 22 gm and since there's been 15 vote meaning that there's still 7 gm that haven't vote. |
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks on Apr 20, 2016 12:58:23 GMT -5
With 11 no votes, this discussion can be sent to the waste bucket  |
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Apr 20, 2016 13:02:57 GMT -5
Barrie, Belfast, Helsinki, Kokanee, Quebec still to vote. Don't we have 22 gm and since there's been 15 vote meaning that there's still 7 gm that haven't vote. sorry....Texas and Ottawa declined their vote. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2016 13:09:40 GMT -5
Don't we have 22 gm and since there's been 15 vote meaning that there's still 7 gm that haven't vote. sorry....Texas and Ottawa declined their vote. Since when we let anyone to decline voting ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2016 13:10:36 GMT -5
I will vote stay at 70
but I don't like the words "for ever". those words are misleading and should not be in the poll.
I voted no. I just don't like the Frank worded it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2016 13:18:49 GMT -5
I will vote stay at 70
but I don't like the words "for ever". those words are misleading and should not be in the poll.
I voted no. I just don't like the Frank worded it.
Be picking as you want Eric. Like always, you want us to vote to your poll and then you do this. We can't bring a topic over and over until we get our way. Oh wait this crap happen in here which fucking annoying. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2016 13:24:06 GMT -5
Frank good work on making a poll. Sorry bro I am so picky sometimes
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Apr 20, 2016 13:33:25 GMT -5
Saint John also hasn't voted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Golden Seals on Apr 20, 2016 21:31:53 GMT -5
No, it's been 70 for a long time. Anyone who mismanages his team, as per roster size, should not get a pass for it. It's easy enough to drop some dead weight.
|
|
