Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2013 10:39:47 GMT -5
I would like to get feedback on this: if finding 20 committed GM's is too difficult, would it make sense for each GM to manage two teams? I would think a rule would have to be made to prevent trades between the same GM. Other than that, it may be a good idea to help begin the draft. If we have 10-15 committed GM's, that's a lot easier to run a league as compared to 30 GM's. At some point if a waiting list starts to form, we could talk about going back to one team per GM. Your thoughts please? thanks guys
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2013 14:49:58 GMT -5
I think 20 GM's with 20 different personalities and what not would be better but if we give it some time and we can't fill all the teams in, GM's can choose to have 2 teams
|
|
|
Post by Tbone (Kelowna) on Apr 7, 2013 19:14:10 GMT -5
And might be just a bit too hard to keep the teams impartial, even if not intentional - would rather just cut down the number of teams if this was the case.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2013 20:54:47 GMT -5
And might be just a bit too hard to keep the teams impartial, even if not intentional - would rather just cut down the number of teams if this was the case. Problem with 10-20 teams is that there's gonna be way more star players per team, so if you want realism or what not...
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Apr 8, 2013 9:30:32 GMT -5
we will get to 24...halfway there
|
|