Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2013 12:56:07 GMT -5
Hey GMs
I know we use CapGeek for our salaries and I noticed the bonuses are now removed from the ELCs making rookies more affordable for us. Wondering if we are using the base salary or salary+bonuses?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2013 16:48:07 GMT -5
Sounds like a job for the poll questionnaire section!
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Nov 12, 2013 21:48:11 GMT -5
Whatever the nhl does, we do
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2013 9:40:33 GMT -5
I dont understand how the NHL operates with salary bonuses. Even Cap Geek has to guess some of the numbers. From Cap Geek:
Averaged performance bonus amounts are completely rolled back, meaning teams potentially exceeding the bonus cushion (Boston, Edmonton, Colorado, Florida) may have less cap space than indicated... The "cap space" column indicates cap space available at season's end if today's roster remains unchanged, while AAV Today and AAV Deadline indicate potential cap space....
|
|
|
Post by Bruyns (Barrie) on Nov 13, 2013 10:05:53 GMT -5
Easiest way to determine cap hit is to look at the AAV column on Cap Geek. This was the number that used to show at the top of the page and is the cap hit that is used when determining a teams total cap. For example www.capgeek.com/player/2538MacKinnon's cap hit isn't calculated as 925K, the 3.775 figure is the one used since the team has to keep cap space for that hit in case he achieves his bonuses.
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Nov 13, 2013 11:30:13 GMT -5
i have everything entered using the numbers including bonuses, so that is the way it will stay. when you go to cap geek now, make sure you UNCHECK the exclude bonuses
|
|