Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2014 14:14:49 GMT -5
I don't know that I would've given Komorov that much, but it's not an overpayment on the scale of Pouliot or Orpik so it's not too bad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2014 14:21:47 GMT -5
Crazy how Moulson and Vanek went opposite.
Moulson sign with Buffalo - 5 years at 5M a year
Vanek sign with Minnesota - 3 years at 6.5 a year
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2014 14:28:00 GMT -5
Vanek left money and term on the table to sign in Minny
|
|
|
|
Post by ltcompton (Red Army) on Jul 1, 2014 14:41:51 GMT -5
Minnesota is going to be downright nasty to deal with next year, they have upped the offensive firepower by a huge margin. Subtract Heatley, add Vanek.....WOW!
|
|
|
|
Post by Bruyns (Barrie) on Jul 1, 2014 15:30:34 GMT -5
Some questionable deals on day 1.
Stoner, Bolland and Engelland would be my top 3 overpaid so far.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2014 15:53:21 GMT -5
I think you forgot Orpik  This is so bad, even worse than the Clarkson signing |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2014 15:56:28 GMT -5
I'd add Gionta to that list.
For what it's worth, I was listening to the Flames press conference. GM mentioned there was competition for Engelland, and noted that Calgary was comfortable paying a little over market value as long as the term was three years or less. (Same thing with Hiller and Raymond). While it's a lot of money, just listening to the guy speak, you can at least tell he's got a plan in place...
|
|
This is so bad, even worse than the Clarkson signing