Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2015 10:26:41 GMT -5
Frank, are you saying the "board" would invent contracts for players that differ from their real life salaries?
I'm not in for that at all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2015 10:30:30 GMT -5
Frank, are you saying the "board" would invent contracts for players that differ from their real life salaries? I'm not in for that at all. It was only a idea. It work in ither leagues and there was never bias toward anyone. Yes with my idea you could lose a player to the UFA. Think about how realistic it could be. If you start benching your starter to tank, that goalie who's a UFA eligible might demand to be traded or you might lose him to UFA since you aren't competing and he want to win now and so on. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2015 10:34:29 GMT -5
I think that type of structure would be interesting if you started a league from scratch with that model.
For our league though, transitioning 24 teams to that system would be extremely difficult, if not impossible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2015 11:43:23 GMT -5
I think that type of structure would be interesting if you started a league from scratch with that model. For our league though, transitioning 24 teams to that system would be extremely difficult, if not impossible. It doesn't mean it can't work and that you'll lose your player. You would have the year to make offer at your UFA/RFA - a max of 5 per week. If a player felt he as less shot at winning the cup like a buffalo team then they would demand a tad more and so on. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2015 12:17:58 GMT -5
We are good until the end of this year. Let's just see how things roll for now and whether somebody steps in the fill the gap caused by the loss of capgeek.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks on Jan 5, 2015 12:18:30 GMT -5
I think that type of structure would be interesting if you started a league from scratch with that model. For our league though, transitioning 24 teams to that system would be extremely difficult, if not impossible. I agree |
|
|
|
Post by zigzag (Zagreb) on Jan 5, 2015 16:01:41 GMT -5
Capgeek was to important for world of hockey, and market leader... I expect that someone will jump to take that position and I don't think we will start new season without some kind of copy of Capgeek. That part of market is to important to be left alone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks on Jan 5, 2015 16:46:03 GMT -5
Capgeek was to important for world of hockey, and market leader... I expect that someone will jump to take that position and I don't think we will start new season without some kind of copy of Capgeek. That part of market is to important to be left alone. Totally agree. Fantasy hockey is important to the NHL. At the very least I would expect the NHL to step up. I would expect that there will be another cap geek fairly quickly. No need for us to panick. |
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Jan 6, 2015 12:34:34 GMT -5
We are good until the end of this year. Let's just see how things roll for now and whether somebody steps in the fill the gap caused by the loss of capgeek.
yep |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2015 15:15:56 GMT -5
This site just popped up in another league I am in BBKL:
www.spotrac.com/nhl/
check it out guys and see if it will work for us.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2015 15:21:47 GMT -5
Spotrac doesn't seem to include signing bonuses in their total. This creates a lower avg salary than we have been using. The site that I have been using that incorporates those bonuses is stats.nhlnumbers.com/ |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2015 15:23:09 GMT -5
yea it's no good. I just saw no updates on the Bobber deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by zigzag (Zagreb) on May 6, 2015 3:28:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on May 6, 2015 7:27:35 GMT -5
This one looks like a good replacement for sure. |
|
