|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Apr 29, 2015 11:59:57 GMT -5
Do we expand to 88 game schedule - as currently on Fantrax (simultaneously vs 3-4 teams per week)
Simple Vote
yes or no
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2015 12:04:27 GMT -5
Yes
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2015 12:05:44 GMT -5
Explain more please?
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Apr 29, 2015 12:09:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Apr 29, 2015 15:37:05 GMT -5
bump
|
|
|
Post by Golden Seals on Apr 29, 2015 16:05:42 GMT -5
i like the rivalries, i look forward to taking my single point from Kelowna the week we play.
is 2 matchups not an option?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2015 17:30:53 GMT -5
I tried multiple matchups in my other league for a year. it was a disaster and our league is converting back to single match ups next year.
@ggs - yes. 2 matchups is an option; it's at least less ridiculous than 4 matches.
Heck, why not go 23 matches a week? Every week everyone plays everyone. What is the logic at stopping at 4?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2015 21:54:14 GMT -5
It does seem extremely chaotic now that I have looked into it further...I heard a few opinions that echoed Dave's re: unmitigated disaster...one dude told me that it throws the balance off strategy-wise, makes luck more of a factor than being savvy. Armed with this new information, I changed my vote to no.
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Apr 30, 2015 9:36:59 GMT -5
Abbotsford, Edmonton, Kokanee, Markham, Red Deer, Richmond
vote please.
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Apr 30, 2015 13:57:45 GMT -5
Poll locked.
Majority votes NO
|
|
|
Post by Bruyns (Barrie) on Apr 30, 2015 14:31:02 GMT -5
Is it worth a poll for 2 games per week?
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Apr 30, 2015 14:40:14 GMT -5
I will post one.
|
|