|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on May 28, 2015 9:42:47 GMT -5
From Off-season Bucket List
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2015 11:09:33 GMT -5
If anything we need to restrict Face Offs won to only centers not increase them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2015 18:37:11 GMT -5
That's two separate issues.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2015 18:39:49 GMT -5
Definitely two separate issues.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2015 19:28:15 GMT -5
Just makes no sense to increase centers and not another position
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2015 19:40:08 GMT -5
Just makes no sense to increase centers and not another position Don't you know that we are aloud to suit up 4Center with 7W, 7D and 2 G or 4 center, 9 W,6 D and 1 G or 4 center, 8W,7D and 1 G ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2015 19:43:35 GMT -5
It does make sense, the other positions (W, D, G) all allow for a flexible number required week-to-week as Frank illustrated. This just increases the number of team variations possible and would allow more customizable lineups depending on your matchup.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2015 19:55:49 GMT -5
It does make sense, the other positions (W, D, G) all allow for a flexible number required week-to-week as Frank illustrated. This just increases the number of team variations possible and would allow more customizable lineups depending on your matchup. I agree with you but I can understand why Cody hate this flex option. Look at Cody center and tell me that he's not being biased toward his vote. I'm sure Cody doesn't want to give a team like Kelowna more edge since Kelowna as some very solid center and by approving such flex make him that much harder to beat. Now try and vote without being biased ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2015 20:07:14 GMT -5
He is free to vote however he wishes, but at least he should back up his dismissive stance with some counter points.
|
|
|
|
Post by Golden Seals on May 28, 2015 21:26:09 GMT -5
I see no need to change rules, especially with the amount of c/w in fantrax. That's all the flexibility you need
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2015 21:51:21 GMT -5
I see no need to change rules, especially with the amount of c/w in fantrax. That's all the flexibility you need
It's not really that "flexible" given that Fantrax has assigned c/w at random, and changes c/w at random. if you lose a c/w at random, then it completely messes with your line up, and that is no fault of your own.
frankly, i don't know why we don't just label everyone at F, given how ridiculous the assignment of positions are...
|
|
|
|
Post by Golden Seals on May 28, 2015 23:26:15 GMT -5
most teams i saw have 3. ive made deals with the c/w in mind, i see no benefit to changing rules so my opponent can be more competitive
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2015 0:02:56 GMT -5
It does make sense, the other positions (W, D, G) all allow for a flexible number required week-to-week as Frank illustrated. This just increases the number of team variations possible and would allow more customizable lineups depending on your matchup. I agree with you but I can understand why Cody hate this flex option. Look at Cody center and tell me that he's not being biased toward his vote. I'm sure Cody doesn't want to give a team like Kelowna more edge since Kelowna as some very solid center and by approving such flex make him that much harder to beat. Now try and vote without being biased ?
bias..........ok Frank |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2015 0:06:16 GMT -5
I see no need to change rules, especially with the amount of c/w in fantrax. That's all the flexibility you need
It's not really that "flexible" given that Fantrax has assigned c/w at random, and changes c/w at random. if you lose a c/w at random, then it completely messes with your line up, and that is no fault of your own.
frankly, i don't know why we don't just label everyone at F, given how ridiculous the assignment of positions are...
For anyone that requests me to back up a stance. Read anything from Buff and assume i agree. Very high iq guy  |
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on May 29, 2015 7:16:51 GMT -5
remember guys, we are able to change position of players. if you have someone at W that should be C, or vice-versa, let me know.
we can change it.
|
|
