Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2015 8:30:52 GMT -5
remember guys, we are able to change position of players. if you have someone at W that should be C, or vice-versa, let me know. we can change it.
I think monahab played point on pp mKing him a d. Please switch |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2015 8:39:15 GMT -5
Just unsure if we're ready to jump from 4 center to 5 center . The only way I could see such a option happen is if we take out the dual position. Like Cody mention we shouldn't be eyeing to increase the use of center but to lower it. But ATM I'm happy with our rules and feel that using 4 center and having the dual option we have in place sufficent. One option I would like to entertain in the near future is if we could suit up 3 center but dressing 10 winger or 8 D or even 3 G. Having the option to dress 3 goalie wouldn't unbalance anything since we still have the max game played for goalie. I so ATM my vote will be No!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2015 8:45:25 GMT -5
remember guys, we are able to change position of players. if you have someone at W that should be C, or vice-versa, let me know. we can change it.
I think monahab played point on pp mKing him a d. Please switchGood one bro!!! Did you know that Mitch Vande Sompel (2015 draftee) is a D, play PP as a D but play PK as a Foward. Does that make him eligible to be a foward ? I would assume no but Dave can always correct me. I m sure you are joking around just wanted to post it . But it might give Mitch dual eligibility .  |
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on May 29, 2015 9:30:31 GMT -5
remember guys, we are able to change position of players. if you have someone at W that should be C, or vice-versa, let me know. we can change it.
I think monahab played point on pp mKing him a d. Please switchhave you been told today Cody?? lol |
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks on May 29, 2015 11:06:35 GMT -5
I see no need to change rules, especially with the amount of c/w in fantrax. That's all the flexibility you need Exactly the reason that I voted no |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2015 17:18:02 GMT -5
I think monahab played point on pp mKing him a d. Please switchhave you been told today Cody?? lol Heh sorry! I just can't stand the idea if wingers getting fow. If we add elig we should take some away  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2015 0:08:04 GMT -5
Again, I see the C/W issue as completely different from 4C versus 5C. On the latter issue, every other position has flexibility of 1 spot, so not sure why C wouldn't.
As for all the C/W's in fantrax, that obviously is a joke, but nobody wants to touch that one. If you sort the league by FOW, you'll see that 2 of the top FOWers last year have C/W status. Totally absurd.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Jun 1, 2015 7:41:49 GMT -5
ABB, CRA, QUE, RCH, STJ still to vote, please.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Jun 1, 2015 11:38:19 GMT -5
ABB, CRA, QUE, RCH, STJ still to vote, please. Nevermind. Majority has been reached. Poll closed. |
|
