|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Oct 27, 2017 13:51:00 GMT -5
So, these are the choices:
1. If you are under the floor then the floor will be raised by 1M next season for each week you are not compliant. If you are over the ceiling then the ceiling will be lowered by 1M next season for each week you are not compliant.
2. Drop 1 Spot per week (Post Lottery)
3. a graduated system: warning issued by League the Sunday previous to start of season. If not compliant by start of season the club drops two places in the third round for the first offence. This will be subsequently followed by two places in the second round for the second offence and two places in the first round for the third offence. If there is a fourth offence then a review of ownership should take place.
4. Floor = NHL Floor. Roster Submission Sunday previous to Start of Season. If not compliant by start of week 1, the offending teams drops 2 spots Round 3 the first week. If not compliant by week 2, then drops 2 spots in round 2. If not compliant by week 3, then drops 2 spots in round 1.
(Penalties would apply to soonest year the team has corresponding pick)
Please - just post the number that you choose.
Thank You.
Votes 1-1 2-1 3-9 4-4
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Oct 27, 2017 13:53:54 GMT -5
4
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2017 14:00:32 GMT -5
Not quite sure between 3 and 4!! hmmm
I'll take option 4
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2017 14:49:10 GMT -5
Not really liking any of these.
Suppose if I must vote, than go with #1. However if the GM quits cause he is mad, the successor GM shouldn't be penalized.
Also disappointed my suggestion didn't make the final 4.
|
|
|
Post by Golden Seals on Oct 27, 2017 16:32:34 GMT -5
2 seems the simplest but is it in all rounds or just round 1?
i vote 2
|
|
|
Post by Djurgardens on Oct 28, 2017 9:45:31 GMT -5
3.
|
|
|
Post by WillyBilly (Tire Fires) on Oct 28, 2017 11:09:31 GMT -5
4
|
|
|
Post by Bruyns (Barrie) on Oct 28, 2017 12:35:31 GMT -5
3
|
|
|
Post by Tbone (Kelowna) on Oct 28, 2017 14:50:44 GMT -5
3
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks on Oct 28, 2017 14:59:08 GMT -5
3
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2017 18:36:40 GMT -5
3
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2017 9:16:40 GMT -5
4
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2017 11:42:22 GMT -5
3
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2017 12:55:02 GMT -5
The score ATM is the following
1 gm voted for Option 1 1 gm voted for Option 2 6 gm voted for Option 3 4 gm voted for Option 4
|
|
|
Post by Dave (PLK) on Oct 29, 2017 12:56:50 GMT -5
Not really liking any of these. Suppose if I must vote, than go with #1. However if the GM quits cause he is mad, the successor GM shouldn't be penalized. Also disappointed my suggestion didn't make the final 4. Your suggestion re cap floor was to drop 2 spots...it was voted down
|
|